The article deals with topical issues of research problems of application of special construction and technical knowledge in determining the suitability for living in the course of the SSTE to be established in the process of interaction between the court and experts-builders; the features of special construction and technical knowledge and the possibility of their use in identifying this category of premises. Judicial practice shows that the expert’s opinion is becoming increasingly important in resolving housing disputes. If earlier the decision on the appointment of construction and technical expertise depended on the discretion of the court and its assessment of the sufficiency of the evidence collected in the case, in recent years, the armed forces of the Russian Federation increasingly draws the attention of lower courts to the fact that the resolution of questions about the quality of housing requires the use of special knowledge.
construction works, judicial construction and technical expertise, special construction and technical knowledge
1. Averina K.N., Podkatilina M.L., Shamaev G.P. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 31 maya 2001 g. N 73-FZ «O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii» // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2018.
2. Andrianov N. Ekspertiza v stroitel'nyh sporah: pravovye pozicii VAS RF i VS RF // EZh-Yurist. 2016. N 27. S. 9.
3. Butyrin A.Yu., Danilkin I.A. Ispol'zovanie special'nyh stroitel'no-tehnicheskih znaniy v rassledovanii moshennichestva pri rekonstrukcii zdaniy i sooruzheniy // Pravovye voprosy nedvizhimosti. 2017. N 1. S. 3 - 6.
4. Bulgakov S.N. Sudebnaya ekspertiza // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2019.
5. Godovoy otchet. Zhilischno-kommunal'noe hozyaystvo - 2018 / pod obsch. red. d. e. n. Yu.A. Vasil'eva. M.: Intensiv, 2018. 224 s.
6. Kichigin N.V. O procedure prinyatiya Ministerstvom oborony Rossiyskoy Federacii resheniya o priznanii pomescheniya zhilym pomescheniem, zhilogo pomescheniya prigodnym (neprigodnym) dlya prozhivaniya grazhdan, a takzhe mnogokvartirnogo doma avariynym i podlezhaschim snosu ili rekonstrukcii // Pravo v Vooruzhennyh Silah. 2017. N 6. S. 44 - 48.
7. Margalitadze O.N., Gorbunov V.S. Osobennosti razvitiya mirovoy ekonomiki i vneshneekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyah globalizacii i regionalizacii: monografiya / Izdatel'stvo: NAuchnyy konsul'tant, 2019. - 170 s.
8. Fomin A.A. Sovershenstvovanie organizacionno-ekonomicheskih mehanizmov regulirovaniya zemel'nyh otnosheniy v agrarnoy otrasli rossiyskoy federacii: monografiya / Izdatel'stvo: Federal'noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya Gosudarstvennyy universitet po zemleustroystvu, 2018. - 556 s.
9. Tendencii i problemy razvitiya zemel'nogo zakonodatel'stva. Materialy k Parlamentskim slushaniyam Soveta Federacii Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federacii i k Stolypinskim chteniyam v Gosudarstvennom universitete po zemleustroystvu 19 aprelya 2018 goda. Pod obsch. red. S.N. Volkova, A.A Fomina / Izdatel'stvo: Gosudarstvennyy universitet po zemleustroystvu, 2018. - 272 s.
10. Tetyuev S.V. Priznanie sadovyh domov prigodnymi dlya prozhivaniya v sudebnom poryadke // Sud'ya. 2016. N 10. S. 56 - 60.
11. Urukov V.N. K voprosu o kriteriyah opredeleniya «edinstvennogo prigodnogo dlya postoyannogo prozhivaniya zhilogo pomescheniya» // Semeynoe i zhilischnoe pravo. 2017. N 1. S. 41 - 44.
12. Urukov V.N. Ustanovlenie «edinstvennogo prigodnogo dlya postoyannogo prozhivaniya zhilogo pomescheniya» v ispolnitel'nom i konkursnom proizvodstve // Praktika ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva. 2016. N 2. S. 10 - 13.
13. 1. Averina K. N., Podkatilin M. L., Shamaev G. P. Commentary to the Federal law of may 31, 2001 N 73-FZ «On state forensic activities in the Russian Federation» // ATP ConsultantPlus. 2018.
14. 2. Andrianov N. Expertise in construction disputes: legal positions of the SAC and the armed forces / / Ezh-Lawyer. 2016. N 27. P.9.
15. 3. Butyrin A. Yu., Danilkin I. A. the Use of special construction and technical knowledge in the investigation of fraud in the reconstruction of buildings and structures // legal issues of real estate. 2017. N 1. C. 3 - 6.
16. 4. Bulgakov S. N. Forensics // ATP ConsultantPlus. 2019.
17. 5. Annual report. Housing and communal services - 2018 / under the General editorship of doctor of Economics Yu. a. Vasilyev. M.: Intensive, 2018. 224 p.
18. 6. Kichigin N. In. About procedure of acceptance by the Ministry of defence of the Russian Federation of the decision on recognition of the room by premises, premises suitable (unsuitable) for accommodation of citizens, and also the apartment house emergency and subject to demolition or reconstruction // the Right in Armed Forces. 2017. N 6. P. 44 - 48.
19. 7. Margalitadze O. N., Gorbunov V. S. Features of development of world economy and foreign economic activity in the conditions of globalization and regionalization: monograph / Publishing house: Scientific consultant, 2019. - 170 p.
20. 8. Fomin A. A. Improvement of organizational and economic mechanisms of regulation of land relations in the agricultural sector of the Russian Federation: monograph / Publisher: Federal state budgetary educational institution of higher professional education State University of land management, 2018. - 556 p.
21. 9. Trends and problems of land legislation development. Materials for the Parliamentary hearings of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and for the Stolypin readings at the State University on land management on April 19, 2018. Under the General editorship of S. N. Volkov And Fomina A. / Publisher: State University of land management, 2018. - 272 p.
22. 10. Tetyuev S. V. Recognition of garden houses suitable for living in court / / Judge. 2016. N 10. P. 56 - 60.
23. 11. Urakov V. N. The question of the criteria of the definition of «the only one suitable for permanent living accommodation» // Family and housing law. 2017. N 1. S. 41 - 44.
24. 12. Urakov V. N. The establishment of «the only one suitable for permanent living accommodation» in Executive and bankruptcy proceedings // the Practice of the Executive production. 2016. N 2. P. 10 - 13.
