UDK 338 Экономическое положение. Экономическая политика. Управление и планирование в экономике. Производство. Услуги. Цены
Based on the analysis of existing studies of foreign and domestic scientists concerning strategic planning, the article attempts to substantiate the necessity of changing the approach to strategic planning of rural territorial systems development. It is offered to lay in a basis of the given process a principle of collective participation with attraction to working out of the purposes of stable development of local community which role in the conditions of transition to strategy of stable development gets the increasing importance. Considering the interests of the local community and its involvement in the process of working out the strategy of development of the territorial system of which it is a part, will allow them to determine their future and to solve those problems which are the most significant for the certain territory.
rural territorial systems, sustainable development planning, local communities, strategic development goals
1. Rossiya v novuyu epohu: vybor prioritetov i celi nacional'nogo razvitiya: ekspertnyy doklad / Ya. I. Kuz'minov. - M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2020. - 112 s.
2. Frank K.I. The rural planning perspective at an opportune time / K. I. Frank, S. A. Reiss // Journal of Planning Literature. -2014. - 29 (4). - Rr. 386-402. - https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412214542050.
3. Brody S.D. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices / S. D. Brody, D. R. Godschalk, R. J. Burby // Journal of the American Planning Association. - 2003. - 69 (3). - Rr. 245-264. - https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308978018.
4. Burby R. J. Making plans that matter: citizen involvement and government action / R. J Burby // Journal of the American Planning Association. - 2003. - 69 (1). - Rr. 33-49. - https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976292.
5. Bagheri A. Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach / A. Bagheri, P. Hjorth // Sustainable Development. - 2007. - 15 (2). - Pp. 83-96. - https://doi.org/10.1002/ sd.310.
6. Mistry J. Community owned solutions: identifying local best practices for social-ecological sustainability / J. Mistry, A. Berardi, C. Tschirhart, E. Bignante, L. Haynes, R. Benjamin, G. Albert, R. Xavier, B. Robertson, O. Davis, D. Jafferally, G. de Ville // Ecology and Society. - 2016. - 21 (2): 42. -https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08496-210242.
7. Hallström L. K. Citizen engagement in sustainability planning: patterns and barriers from Hinton and Wood Buffalo, Alberta, Canada / L. K. Hallström, G. Hvenegaard, N. J. Dipa // Journal of Rural and Community Development. - 2019. - 14 (2). - Pp. 42-65. - https://doi. org/10.7939/r3-7tt0-sy41.
8. Moallemi E. A. Evaluating participatory modeling methods for co-creating pathways to sustainability / E. A. Moallemi, F. J. de Haan, M. Hadjikakou, S. Khatami, S. Malekpour, A. Smajgl, M. S. Smith, A. Voinov, R. Bandari, P. Lamichhane, K. K. Miller, E. Nicholson, W. Novalia, E. G. Ritchie, A. M. Rojas, M. A. Shaikh, K. Szetey, B. A. Bryan // Earth’s Future. - 2021. - 9 (3). - https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001843.
9. Manzo L. C. Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning / L. C. Manzo, D. D. Perkins // Journal of Planning Literature. - 2006. - 20 (4). - Pp. 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412205286160.
10. Morrison T. H. Pursuing rural sustainability at the regional level: key lessons from the literature on institutions, integration, and the environment / T. H. Morrison // Journal of Planning Literature. - 2006. - 21 (2). - Pp. 143-152. -https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412206292261.
11. Hibbard M. Notes for a substantive theory of rural planning: evidence from the US experience / M. Hibbard, K. I. Frank // Planning Theory and Practice. - 2019. - 20 (3). - Pp. 339-357. - https://doi. org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1627572.
12. McLean B. L. Barriers to implementing sustainability locally: a case study of policy immobilities / B. L. McLean, T. Borén // Local Environment. - 2015. - 20 (12). - Pp.1489-1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/135498¬ 39.2014.909798.
13. Čiegis R. Participatory aspects of strategic sustainable development planning in local communities: experience of Lithuania / R. Čiegis, D. Gineitiené // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. - 2008. - 14 (2). - Pp. 107-117. - https://doi. org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.107-117.
14. Strategii malyh gorodov: territoriya tvorchestva / Pod red. B.S. Zhiharevicha. - SPb.: MCSEI «Leont'evskiy centr», 2017. - 68 s.
15. Zhiharevich B.S. Strategicheskoe planirovanie na urovne poseleniy: Fakty i mneniya / B. S. Zhiharevich, T. K. Pribyshin // Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya. - 2018. - № 1. - S. 47-67. -ISSN: 1999-5431.
16. Zhiharevich B.S. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v sel'skih poseleniyah Rossii / B.S. Zhiharevich, N.A. Lebedeva // Regional'nye issledovaniya. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 36-47. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-2-4.
17. O strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiyskoy Federacii: Federal'nyy zakon ot 28 iyunya 2014 g. № 172- FZ. - Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tant plyus». - Tekst: elektronnyy. - URL: http: // www.consultant.ru. (data obrascheniya: 06.05.2022).
18. Burak R. I. Improving the Tools for Strategic Economic Planning at the Regional Level: Main Directions of the Search for New Solutions / P. I. Burak, V. G. Rostanets, A. I. Kabalinsky, I. S. Androshina, E. V. Shurinova // Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques. - 2020. - 8 (4). - Pp. 1480-1485.
19. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2025 goda (utv. rasporyazheniem Pravitel'stva RF ot 13 fevralya 2019 g. № 207-r). - Spravochno-pravovaya sistema «Konsul'tant plyus». - Tekst: elektronnyy. - URL: http: // www.consultant.ru. (data obrascheniya: 12.03.2022).
20. Burak P. I. Nauchno-metodicheskoe obespechenie implementacii Federal'nogo zakona o strategicheskom planirovanii v RF na regional'nom urovne / P. I. Burak // Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. -2014. - №11. - S. 107-114.
21. Hallström L. K. Rural sustainability plans in Canada: An analysis of structure, content and influence / L. K. Hallström, G. T. Hvenegaard, J. L. Stonechild, N. J. Dipa // Journal of Rural Studies. - 2017. - 56. - Pp. 132-142. -https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-hrpm-fj05.
22. Bagheri A. Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach / A. Bagheri, P. Hjorth // Sustainable Development. - 2007. - 15(2). - Pp. 83-96. - https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.310.
23. Szetey K. Participatory planning for local sustainability guided by the Sustainable Development Goals / K. Szetey, E. A. Moallemi, E. Ashton, M. Butcher, B. Sprunt, B. A. Bryan // Ecology and Society. - 2021. - 26(3). -16. - https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12566-260316.
24. ElMassah S. Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) / S. ElMassah, M. Mohieldin // Ecological Economics. - 2020. - 169:106490. - https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2019.106490.
25. Szetey, K., E. Ashton, and S. Bradshaw. 2020. The Forrest and District Plan: Towards 2030. Forrest and District Community Group, Forrest, Australia. [online] URL: https://www.localsdgs. org/recently-published/forrest-amp-district-plan-gtgt-towards-2030-36yc3.
26. Moallemi E. A. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals requires transdisciplinary innovation at the local scale / E. A. Moallemi, S. Malekpour, M. Hadjikakou, R. Raven, K. Szetey, D. Ningrum, A. Dhiaylhaq, B. A. Bryan // One Earth. - 2020. - 3 (3). - Pp. 300-313. -https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.006.
